-
Section 01
Section One: Demographics of disabled public servants
-
Section 02
Section Two: Intersection with the Rainbow Communities
-
Section 03
Section Three: Qualifications, occupations, and remuneration
-
Section 04
Section Four: Tenure
-
Section 05
Section Five: Flexible working
-
Section 06
Section Six: Work Satisfaction, Skills, and Development
-
Section 07
Section Seven: Trust and Inclusion in the Workplace
-
Section 08
Conclusion and next steps
In general, a higher proportion of disabled public servants in Te Taunaki identified as being part of the Rainbow communities than did non-disabled public servants (15.9% vs 9.0%).[1]
A large proportion of disabled public servants identified as being straight or heterosexual (85.3%) but they were less likely to identify as straight or heterosexual than their non-disabled colleagues (91.5%).
Table 5: Proportion of disabled/non-disabled public servants by sexual identities
|
Disabled |
Non-Disabled |
---|---|---|
Straight or heterosexual |
85.3% |
91.5% |
Gay |
2.8% |
2.1% |
Lesbian |
2.1% |
1.4% |
Bisexual |
7.7% |
4.1% |
Sexual identity not elsewhere classified |
2.2% |
0.9% |
[1] This grouping is made from responses to a combination of questions around gender, sexual orientation, being transgender, and/or having an intersex variation. As some of these groups were particularly small in Te Taunaki, we have been unable to include analyses of the combination of disability and communities such as public servants who are transgender, intersex, and/or of another/multiple genders due to privacy/confidentiality requirements.